Notes: There is some disagreement amongst scholars about the name form: @Whitelock 1979 has 'Eadwulf', whereas @Swanton 1996 has 'Ealdwulf'. @Cubbin 1996, p. 15 app. crit. [778] 1, reports a 'w written over d with a dot beneath', which implies that the scribe of MS D felt that the 'd' was an error that was then subpuncted. MS E has, however, 'Ealdulf', implying that the first element was indeed 'eald'.