Deorwulf 19

Deorwulf ‘of Alphamstone’ (Essex), fl. 1066x1086
Male
DWP
4 of 5

Name

Deorwulf
Deorwulf 18

Summary

Deorwulf 19 was a free man with a minute holding in north Essex TRE assessed at only 3 acres and with a probable value of about 1½s; he was commended to Wihtgar son of Ælfric (Wihtgar 10).  It is more likely than not that Deorwulf survived the Conquest and was still holding his land in 1086, albeit then as a minor subtenant of Richard fitzGilbert (Richard 5).

Distribution map of property and lordships associated with this name in DB

List of property and lordships associated with this name in DB

Holder 1066

Shire Phil. ref. Vill DB Spelling Holder 1066 Lord 1066 Tenant-in-Chief 1086 1086 Subtenant Fiscal Value 1066 Value 1086 Value Conf. Show on Map
Essex 90,60 Alphamstone Derolfus Deorwulf 'of Alphamstone' Wihtgar son of Ælfric Richard fitzGilbert Deorwulf 0.03 0.08 0.11 B
Totals

Subtenant in 1086

Shire Phil. ref. Vill DB Spelling Holder 1066 Lord 1066 Tenant-in-Chief 1086 1086 Subtenant Fiscal Value 1066 Value 1086 Value Conf. Show on Map
Essex 90,60 Alphamstone Derolfus Deorwulf 'of Alphamstone' Wihtgar son of Ælfric Richard fitzGilbert Deorwulf 0.03 0.08 0.11 D
Totals

Profile

Deorwulf 19’s land was at Alphamstone, which overlooks a small tributary of the River Stour in north Essex near the border with Suffolk.  The DB entry, which describes Deorwulf as a free man, occurs among the invasiones, or ‘encroachments’, of Richard fitzGilbert (Richard 5) towards the end of the Essex folios, in a small group of which the scribe noted that ‘Wihtgar had only the commendation’.  The implication is that TRE the men were commended to Richard’s antecessor, Wihtgar son of Ælfric (Wihtgar 10), and that Richard had acquired their lands on this basis even though they had not been dependent tenants of Wihtgar.

For the first man named in this group, the DB entry states that he held his land both TRE and in 1086.  Although DB does not say this explicitly in the subsequent entries, this precedent and the format of the whole group renders it more likely than not that all of the men listed, including Deorwulf 19, were still holding their lands in 1086, albeit now as subtenants of Richard fitzGilbert. 

Although DB records another TRE landholder called Deorwulf with holdings about 25 miles away in Suffolk, the two men had different commended lords and their holdings were far too small for any connection between them to be considered.