Iusten 7
Iusten ‘of Long Sutton’ (Hants), fl. 1066
Male
DWP
4 of 5
Summary
Iusten 7 shared with Leofsige 65 an estate in north-east Hampshire TRE assessed at 7 hides with a value of £7; they held this estate in parage as tenants of Archbishop Stigand (Stigand 1) and the Old Minster, Winchester.Distribution map of property and lordships associated with this name in DB
List of property and lordships associated with this name in DB
Holder 1066
Shire | Phil. ref. | Vill | DB Spelling | Holder 1066 | Lord 1066 | Tenant-in-Chief 1086 | 1086 Subtenant | Fiscal Value | 1066 Value | 1086 Value | Conf. | Show on Map |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hampshire | 3,8 | Long Sutton | Justanus | Iusten 'of Sutton' | Stigand, archbishop of Canterbury | Walkelin, bishop of Winchester | unnamed monks of Old Minster, Winchester, in 1086 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 3.50 | D | Map |
Totals |
Profile
Iusten 7’s estate was at Long Sutton, a part of the manor of Crondall in the North Downs of north-east Hampshire. He held it in parage with Leofsige 65, which suggests that the men were related although each had his own hall. Crondall was part of the endowment of the Old Minster at Winchester and was one of the manors assigned to the monks’ provisions, and DB notes that Iusten and Leofsige were tenants of Stigand 1 (here in his role as bishop of Winchester), from whom ‘they could not depart’.It is unlikely that Iusten 7 was the same person as Iusten 6 despite them having the same rare name and moderate estates in Hampshire TRE, because those estates were more than 50 miles apart, were held under different lords TRE and passed to different post-Conquest successors. On balance, therefore, it is better to regard them as separate men.