Table of Contents
Top of page
Name
Summary
Distribution Map
Property List
Profile
Bibliography
Bottom of page
Frederic 4
Frederic ‘of Kent’, fl. 1066
Male
CPL
4 of 5
Summary
Frederic 4 was a thegn with a single manor of 1 sulung worth 70s. in east Kent.Distribution map of property and lordships associated with this name in DB
List of property and lordships associated with this name in DB
Holder 1066
Shire | Phil. ref. | Vill | DB Spelling | Holder 1066 | Lord 1066 | Tenant-in-Chief 1086 | 1086 Subtenant | Fiscal Value | 1066 Value | 1086 Value | Conf. | Show on Map |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kent | 9,1 | Eastwell | Frederic | Frederic 'of Kent' | Edward, king | Hugh de Montfort | - | 2.00 | 3.50 | 3.50 | E | Map |
Totals |
Profile
The name Frederic occurs as a TRE landowner only three times, all in south-eastern England. On balance, however, they are marginally more likely to belong to two different people, Frederic 4 in Kent and Frederic 5 in Sussex (contra Lewis 1994: 141): different spellings are used in the two counties, and the nearer of the Sussex manors is 55 difficult miles through the Weald from the Kentish manor. At first sight it might be thought unlikely that two thegns in relatively close proximity would have the same Continental name, otherwise not used in pre-Conquest England, but in fact the south-east was precisely the region in which such a name would appear, whether brought by immigrants from Europe or adopted by native families familiar with Continental names.The Kentish manor in question is Eastwell, a small east Kentish vill, rather valuable for its size, at the eastern end of the spring-line in Holmesdale. Its much larger neighbour Westwell, from which it looks to have been cut at some earlier period (Kain and Oliver 2001: nos. 19/292–3), belonged to the monks of Christ Church, Canterbury (Kent 3:16), and was perhaps an early centre of settlement (Everitt 1986: 76, 88, 102, 188, 197, 199), but in recorded times the manor of Eastwell was entirely independent and without links to Westwell or Canterbury (Hasted 1797–1801: VII, 398–412), so that Canterbury connections cannot be used to explain the appearance of the Continental name here.
Bibliography
Everitt 1986: Alan Everitt, Continuity and Colonization: The Evolution of Kentish Settlement (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1986)
Hasted 1797–1801: Edward Hasted, The History and Topographical Survey of Kent, 2nd edn, 12 vols (1797–1801)
Kain and Oliver 2001: Roger J. P. Kain and Richard R. Oliver, Historic Parishes of England & Wales: An Electronic Map of Boundaries before 1850 with a Gazetteer and Metadata (Colchester: History Data Service, 2001)
Lewis 1994: C. P. Lewis, ‘The French in England before the Norman Conquest’, Anglo-Norman Studies, 17: Proceedings of the Battle Conference, 1994 (1995), 123–44