Colswein 13

Colswein ‘of Winford’ (Som.)  (fl. 1071x1086)
Male
DWP
4 of 5

Name

Colswein
Colswein 12
Colswein 14

Summary

Colswein 13 held 2 hides at Winford in north Somerset as a subtenant of Bishop Geoffrey of Coutances (Geoffrey 2) in 1086.

Distribution map of property and lordships associated with this name in DB

List of property and lordships associated with this name in DB

Subtenant in 1086

Shire Phil. ref. Vill DB Spelling Holder 1066 Lord 1066 Tenant-in-Chief 1086 1086 Subtenant Fiscal Value 1066 Value 1086 Value Conf. Show on Map
Somerset 5,41 Winford Colsuain Ælfric Cild - Geoffrey, bishop of Coutances Colswein 'of Winford' 1.00 1.25 1.25 -
Somerset 5,41 Winford Colsuain Alweald the bald - Geoffrey, bishop of Coutances Colswein 'of Winford' 1.00 1.25 1.25 -
Totals

Bibliography


Colswein 13 held 2 hides at Winford in north Somerset as a subtenant of Bishop Geoffrey of Coutances (Geoffrey 2) in 1086; one of the hides was part of the main estate and worth 20s 6d if the estate value was divided proportionally among the total hidage, while the other had been added to the estate after the Conquest and was worth 25s.  Given that the name Colswein was uncommon, particularly in the south-west, it is likely that Colswein 13 was also the ‘man of the bishop of Countances’ who had taken (in 1071 if the ‘five years TRW’ of the DB entry is to be thus interpreted) the common pasture from Newton Tracey in north-west Devon, despite this being nearly 70 miles from Winford.  The implication is that Colswein had added the pasture to one of the bishop’s nearby manors, perhaps that at Horwood (Thorn and Thorn 1985: DB Dev 3,17 Notes; 25,3 Notes) or that at Fremington, the parish of which included Bartridge Common lying between Newton Tracey and Horwood (Kain and Oliver 2001: 09/38-9, 42).  If so, then Colswein 13 may also be the man of that name who occurs as the first witness to a manumission relating to Bishop Geoffrey’s estate at Clyst, a few miles to the east of Exeter (Pelteret 1990: 107 no.111).  Taking these instances together suggests that Colswein 13 acted as a reeve for the bishop’s south-western estates, but there is no obvious reason to associate him with anyone else of that name.